Who Wrote the Gospels?

four-gospels2 Part Post…

Timothy Paul Jones Mark, Luke, and John dictated the books that bear their names? According to skeptics, these four first-century personalities had little or nothing to do with the four New Testament Gospels. One scholar of the more skeptical sort has described the process in this way:

[The New Testament Gospels] were written thirty-five to sixty-five years after Jesus’ death, … not by people who were eyewitnesses, but by people living later. … Where did these people get their information from? … After the days of Jesus, people started telling stories about him in order to convert others to the faith.[i] … When … Christians recognized the need for apostolic authorities, they attributed these books to apostles (Matthew and John) and close companions of apostles (Mark, the secretary of Peter; and Luke the traveling companion of Paul).[ii]

In other words, Christians didn’t connect the Gospels to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John because these individuals actually wrote the Gospels. Early believers fabricated these connections to make the documents seem more authoritative.

Now, it is indeed quite likely that the earliest Gospel manuscripts didn’t include titles in the manuscripts themselves (though the possibility titles on tabs hanging from manuscripts or inscribed at the end of each book should not be ruled out). But there’s a serious problem with the skeptics’ reconstruction.[iii] By the late first and early second century, the Gospels had spread throughout the Roman Empire.[iv]

If second-century Christians had simply added names to each Gospel to make that Gospel seem authoritative, what would have happened? (Remember, there was no centrally-recognized authority to force congregations to connect a certain name to each Gospel—no executive director, no denominational board, no international convention of Christians.[v] And it wasn’t as if one pastor could stop by an office and email fellow-pastors about how to name a certain Gospel!)

Here’s what would likely have occurred: One church might have dubbed a Gospel with the name of Andrew, for example, while another congregation ascribed the same Gospel to Peter or Thaddeus or Bartholomew. As a result, each Gospel might have a half-dozen—or more!—different names, depending on where your ship happened to land.

But that’s not even close to what we find when we look at the ancient manuscripts. Continue reading

Why you can trust your Bible

Interview with Peter Williams which isn’t included in the earliest manuscripts?

How can churches better equip young people for challenges to their trust in Scripture?

Is inerrancy a helpful term?

How do you encourage Christians to trust their English Bibles are sufficient to equip them for every good work?

Are churches teaching people enough about humanity’s role in the transmission of the biblical texts?

What resources do you recommend for pastors and others on the trustworthiness of Scripture?

How do we know?

Dr. Michael Kruger is President and Samuel C. Patterson Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at Reformed Theological Seminary, Charlotte, NC. He is the author and editor of numerous books in defense of the Bible, including “The Question of Canon”, “Canon Revisited”, “The Heresy of Orthodoxy” and “Gospel Fragments”. In addition, he is an ordained minister in the Presbyterian Church in America.

Topic #1: The Self Authenticating Bible – How do we know the Bible is God’s Word?

Topic #2: “The Bible’s Missing Books?” – How do we know we have the right books in the Bible and why do we think that we do?