If Jesus returned, where is He?

Article by Jason L. Bradfield:

Hyper-preterism repeatedly stumbles over one unavoidable question: if Christ “returned” in AD 70, where is He now?

The New Testament presents the return of Christ as the personal, visible appearing of the same Jesus who ascended. Yet no one in AD 70 saw the risen Lord descend bodily from heaven. There was no public manifestation of the incarnate Son, no resurrection of the dead, no consummated presence of Christ dwelling bodily with His people forever. If that was the return, what exactly returned? And where is Jesus presently?

The difficulty is not rhetorical. It is biblical.

In Acts 1:9-11, the disciples watched Him ascend. The angels declared, “This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven” (ESV). The emphasis falls on identity and manner. This Jesus. The same one. The embodied, risen Lord. The departure was visible and bodily. The promise of return is framed in those same terms.

Acts 3:21 states that heaven “must receive him until the time for restoring all the things about which God spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets” (ESV). Christ is received into heaven. He remains there. There is an “until.” That language presupposes ongoing bodily absence followed by a future appearing.

Jesus Himself structured hope around this reality. “I go to prepare a place for you… I will come again and will take you to myself” (John 14:2-3, ESV). In John 16:7 He said, “It is to your advantage that I go away” (ESV). There is a real going away. The promise of coming again depends on it.

At the same time, He assures his disciples, “I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20, ESV). How can He both go away and remain with his people? The only coherent answer is the distinction between His natures. According to His humanity, He is absent and in heaven. According to His divinity, He is present everywhere.

Colossians 3:1 directs believers to seek the things above, “where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God” (ESV). Hebrews 9:24 declares that “Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf” (ESV). His mediatorial ministry is exercised from heaven. Scripture consistently speaks of His bodily absence.

The Reformed tradition did not invent this distinction. It articulated it faithfully. The Heidelberg Catechism explains:

Question 46

How dost thou understand these words, “he ascended into heaven”?

That Christ, in sight of his disciples, was taken up from earth into heaven; and that he continues there for our interest, until he comes again to judge the quick and the dead.

Question 47

Is not Christ then with us even to the end of the world, as he has promised?

Christ is very man and very God; with respect to his human nature, he is no more on earth; but with respect to his Godhead, majesty, grace and spirit, he is at no time absent from us.

Question 48

But if his human nature is not present, wherever his Godhead is, are not then these two natures in Christ separated from one another?

Not as all, for since the Godhead is illimitable and omnipresent, it must necessarily follow that the same is beyond the limits of the human nature he assumed, and yet is nevertheless in this human nature, and remains personally united to it. (1)

This is nothing more than careful biblical theology. Christ continues in heaven according to His human nature. He is never absent according to his Godhead. The natures are neither confused nor separated.

Once that framework is in place, the meaning of “return” becomes clear. To return is to go back to a place that was left. The divine nature never left. God is omnipresent. There can be no “return” of deity in a spatial sense. If someone speaks of Christ’s return as a non-bodily event, what exactly is returning? His divine essence? That would imply prior absence and movement, which contradicts the very nature of God.

A meaningful return must concern the incarnate person according to His human nature.

This is where the significance of the name “Jesus” becomes unavoidable. The angel declared, “You shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21, ESV). The name belongs to the incarnate Son, the one born of Mary. It is the name of the God-man.

After the resurrection and ascension, Scripture continues to use that name. Peter proclaims, “God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified” (Acts 2:36, ESV). Paul writes long after the ascension, “There is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5, ESV). Not was. Is. He remains man.

The incarnation was not temporary. Hebrews 7:24-25 teaches that He holds his priesthood permanently and always lives to make intercession (ESV). His ongoing mediatorial work presupposes his continuing humanity. The one who intercedes is still the God-man.

To deny a future bodily return inevitably pressures this doctrine. If Christ’s humanity does not return, if there is no future visible appearing of the incarnate Son, then what has become of the man Christ Jesus? If His deity never departed and cannot return, and His humanity does not return, the word return becomes meaningless.

More seriously, the permanence of the incarnation is undermined. To confess that Jesus Christ remains very man and very God is not optional or secondary. It is essential to the Christian faith. It safeguards the gospel itself. If the incarnation is treated as a temporary phase rather than an abiding reality, then the identity of Jesus is altered.

The New Testament holds these truths together with clarity. The one who ascended is the one who will come again. The one who was taken up will return in the same way. He continues in heaven for our interest until He comes to judge the living and the dead. His deity is omnipresent. His humanity is exalted and located. His person is one.

So the question remains simple and decisive. If Jesus “returned” in AD 70, where is He now? Scripture says He is in heaven according to His human nature, awaiting the appointed day of His appearing. Any system that cannot account for that absence and that promised bodily return is not merely adjusting eschatology. It is tampering with the identity of Jesus Himself.

1 – Historic Creeds and Confessions. 1997. Electronic ed. Oak Harbor: Lexham Press.

Why Did Jesus Have to Die?

There are passages in Scripture that do not merely inform the mind, they arrest the conscience. Isaiah 52:13–53:12 is one of them.

If someone says, “The Old Testament is not really about Jesus,” or “The idea of substitutionary atonement is a later Christian invention,” this chapter stands there, unblushing, and says, “Read me again.” It is not vague. It is not sentimental. It is not a generic meditation on suffering. It is stunningly specific. And it answers one of the most important questions any human being will ever face.

How can a guilty sinner be right with a holy God?

Isaiah 53 is the first gospel. Not Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. Those came centuries later. Seven hundred years before Jesus was born, God gave us the complete story of the Messiah’s suffering, death, and vindication. The New Testament quotes or alludes to Isaiah 53 more than 40 times. Every major New Testament writer points back to this chapter. It is the most complete explanation of the atonement in all of Scripture, Old Testament or New.

Start with a simple summary line from the New Testament: “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God” (1 Peter 3:18). That is the destination, bring us to God. That is the means, the righteous for the unrighteous. Isaiah 53 is the Old Testament chapter that lays that logic bare, with breathtaking clarity.

The Servant: exalted, then shattered

Isaiah begins with heights: “Behold, my servant shall act wisely; he shall be high and lifted up, and shall be exalted” (Isaiah 52:13). That phrase “high and lifted up” is the language Isaiah has already used of the Lord enthroned in majesty (Isaiah 6:1). The Servant is not merely impressive. He is glorious.

Then the chapter jolts you. The exalted One becomes disfigured: “His appearance was so marred, beyond human semblance” (Isaiah 52:14). Glory, then a descent. Majesty, then blood and ruin. Not the kind of “victory” anyone expects.

And yet, Isaiah insists that this suffering is not a tragic detour. It is the path. “So shall he sprinkle many nations” (Isaiah 52:15). The language is priestly. Sprinkling is cleansing language, the application of what purifies the unclean. Some note that the ancient Greek translation highlights the nations being “astonished” at Him, and in context both themes fit: the nations are cleansed, and kings are stunned into silence. “Kings shall shut their mouths because of him” (Isaiah 52:15). Why? Because their instincts about power collapse here. God conquers, not by the sword, but by sacrifice.

This is not merely Israel’s story. It is “many nations.” It is global in scope.

The confession: “We misread Him”

Isaiah 53 reads like a confession from people who finally realize how wrong they were. That matters. The verbs are largely in the past tense. It is as though a future people are looking back, saying, “How did we miss it?”

But who are these people? When does this confession happen? The prophet Zechariah gives us the answer. He describes a future day when God will pour out “a spirit of grace and supplication” on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem. “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication, so that when they look on me, on him whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child” (Zechariah 12:10). A day is coming when Israel will look back on the Messiah they rejected and pierced, and they will mourn. Isaiah 53 is their confession. This is what they will say when their eyes are finally opened.

“Who has believed what he has heard from us?” (Isaiah 53:1). Unbelief is the opening lament.

Then comes the description of the Servant’s unimpressive appearance: “He had no form or majesty that we should look at him” (Isaiah 53:2). No celebrity shine. No outward grandeur. Nothing that flatters human pride.

And the response is dreadful: “He was despised and rejected by men” (Isaiah 53:3). Twice Isaiah says “despised.” This is not mild indifference. This is scorn.

If you want an apologetic point that lands with force, it is this: Isaiah does not present humanity as neutral observers of God’s salvation. We do not weigh Jesus fairly and then decide. Left to ourselves, we misread true glory. We prefer outward glitter. We resist humble grace.

The center: substitution, not inspiration

Then Isaiah reaches the heart of the matter, and the pronouns begin to preach. Our, we, us… and Him.

“Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows” (Isaiah 53:4). Yet we judged Him wrongly: “We esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted” (Isaiah 53:4). In other words, we assumed God was simply punishing Him for His own guilt.

But Isaiah corrects the record with the clearest “but” in the Old Testament: “But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities” (Isaiah 53:5).

Not His sin. Ours.

And notice what His suffering achieves: “Upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace” (Isaiah 53:5). That peace is not mainly a mood. It is an objective reconciliation. It is the kind of peace Paul describes: “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).

But there’s something even deeper in verse 6. Verses 4-5 focus on what we have done: our transgressions, our iniquities, the specific sins we have committed. Those are behavioral. But verse 6 goes deeper: “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned, every one, to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

Now we’re not just talking about behavior. We’re talking about nature. This is what sheep do. They wander. They go astray. It’s characteristic of sheep. We’re not sinners because we sin; we sin because we’re sinners. We have a sin problem at the very core of our humanity. David confessed this: “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me” (Psalm 51:5). He didn’t mean the conception was sinful. He meant he was a sinner from conception.

So Christ on the cross is bearing both: the sins we have committed and the sinful nature we inherited. He died for all of it. That is the gospel, in Old Testament clothing.

And Isaiah is stunningly specific about how this suffering would unfold. The Servant would be “numbered with the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12). That happened when Jesus was crucified between two criminals (Luke 23:32-33). His grave was “assigned with the wicked,” yet He was “with a rich man in his death” (Isaiah 53:9). That happened when Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy member of the council, took Jesus’ body and laid it in his own new tomb (Matthew 27:57-60). These are not vague poetic images. These are verifiable details that came true seven centuries later.

Not “God looked the other way.” Not “God lowered the standard.” Not “God forgave by pretending sin is not serious.” No. The guilt is laid on Another. The Servant becomes the Substitute.

The riddle resolved: mercy and justice meet

Here we touch the great tension that runs through the Old Testament. It’s what we might call the riddle of Exodus 34. When Moses asked to see God’s glory, the Lord proclaimed His name: “The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin” (Exodus 34:6-7). That sounds like pure grace, doesn’t it? But the very next phrase turns the riddle sharp: “but who will by no means clear the guilty” (Exodus 34:7).

Wait. How can both be true? How can God be merciful, gracious, forgiving, AND refuse to clear the guilty? How can He forgive sinners and still remain just?

Every religion in the world offers a wrong answer to that question. Some say God lowers the standard. Some say He looks the other way. Some say our good deeds outweigh our bad. But none of those answers solve the riddle. They all leave God either unjust or unforgiving.

Isaiah 53 gives the answer: the guilt is not cleared by being ignored. It is dealt with by being transferred. Justice is satisfied by a true penalty borne by a true substitute. God shows grace to the penitent, believing sinner AND punishes His Son in that sinner’s place. Both sides of Exodus 34 are upheld. Mercy and justice meet at the cross.

This is why Christians speak of penal substitution. Penal, because a real penalty is paid. Substitution, because Another stands in the guilty one’s place. Isaiah does not blush to say “crushed” (Isaiah 53:10). He does not soften the edges. Sin is so serious it required this. Grace is so deep it provided this.

And here the New Testament shines a bright light on what Isaiah is describing: “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Not that Jesus became sinful in His own character, but that He was treated as the sin-bearer, so that sinners could be treated as righteous in Him.

Here’s an astonishing truth: in three hours of darkness, Jesus bore the sins of His people. But if sinners in hell bear their own sins forever and the debt is never paid, how can Jesus pay it fully in three hours? The answer: Jesus is an infinite person. His divine nature means His suffering has infinite worth. What finite sinners can never satisfy in eternity, the infinite Son of God satisfied completely for all who believe.

The Lamb who submits, and then triumphs

Isaiah’s Servant is not only crushed. He is quiet. “Like a lamb that is led to the slaughter… so he opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7). He does not defend Himself. He yields Himself.

He dies: “He was cut off out of the land of the living” (Isaiah 53:8). And yet, remarkably, he also lives on: “He shall see his offspring; he shall prolong his days” (Isaiah 53:10). Death, then life. Cut off, then prolonged days. Isaiah has resurrection written into the texture of the prophecy.

And what is the result? “By his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities” (Isaiah 53:11). Justification is there. A righteous Servant making many righteous, because He bears their iniquities.

Finally, the Servant is vindicated and exalted, and He continues to act for His people: “He bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12). The Substitute is also the Intercessor.

So what do we do with this?

You can call it coincidence if you like, but the coherence is overwhelming. A suffering, silent lamb. Rejected, despised. Pierced, crushed. Bearing sins not His own. Bringing peace. Cleansing many nations. Death, then prolonged days. Justifying the many. Interceding for transgressors.

Listen to how the New Testament summarizes it: “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God” (1 Peter 3:18). When you lay that verse next to Isaiah 53, the pieces lock together. Seven hundred years apart, same gospel.

May I ask you plainly: when you look at the cross, do you see a moral example only, or do you see your Substitute? Have you come to the place where you stop saying, “Look what I have done,” and begin to say, “Lord Jesus, You stood in my place”?

Isaiah 53 is not merely ancient prophecy. It is a question directed at you: Will you let these words be yours? Will you say, “He bore my griefs, carried my sorrows, was pierced for my transgressions, crushed for my iniquities”? That is what it means to believe.

We come with empty hands. We come as sinners. And we look away from ourselves to the Servant of the Lord, the Lamb who was slain, and we find that a fountain has been opened for cleansing.

Seven hundred years before the cross, God wrote Isaiah 53. And when Jesus hung there, every word was fulfilled. The Servant was exalted, shattered, vindicated. The Substitute bore our sins. The Lamb opened not His mouth. And now He lives forever, making intercession for us.

“Behold, my servant…” (Isaiah 52:13). Look. Do not look away.