The Message of Islam vs. The Gospel of Jesus

Islam7Don Carson, Douglas Sweeney and Harold A. Netland have co-written an article entitled “The Message of Islam vs. The Gospel of Jesus” – original source here.

Questions about relations between Muslims and Christians continue to receive widespread attention in the media and society at large. In particular, “Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God?” has become especially controversial among Christians in the United States. Responses have often been polarizing, with one side insisting the answer must be affirmative and the other vehemently denying this. But the question itself is highly ambiguous and conflates different issues in an unhelpful manner. Thus, rather than trying to answer directly whether Christians and Muslims worship the same God, it’s more helpful to consider similarities and differences in the beliefs of Muslims and Christians, noting areas of both agreement and disagreement.

There are some clear similarities between Christian and Muslim beliefs. For example, both Islam and Christianity are monotheistic religions that maintain the universe was created by God, that God has given humanity a special revelation, and that there will be a final judgment.

But there are fundamental differences as well—differences that take us to the heart of the Christian gospel and the New Testament teachings about Jesus Christ. What follows is a very concise introduction to some aspects of Islam and Christianity, focusing on several significant points at which the Christian gospel is different from what Islam traditionally has maintained. Highlighting differences shouldn’t be taken as minimizing important similarities between the religions. Since the basic differences concern the core of the gospel, though, appreciation of similarities must be framed with awareness of the differences. Continue reading

Speculation and the Absence of True Scholarship

I just have to say that this is the kind of teaching so typical in the charismatic/word of faith movement. Firstly traditional scholarship (coming from those with true academic credentials) is dismissed out of hand as having missed the entire point of the passage. With that out of the way, with almost apostolic announcement, the “true” meaning of the passage is given. There is never a reference to other scholars who have come to the same conclusion. The teacher has spoken and all we hoped to understand is now revealed, and of course, the “revelation” leaves the listener/reader totally dependent on the charismatic teacher to understand this and any other passage.

Rick Renner (the man in the above video) writes, “Just about the time Jesus finished healing the ear of the servant of the high priest named Malchus, the Gospel of Mark tells us a naked young man was found in the Garden of Gethsemane. Mark 14:51,52 says, “And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him: and he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.” Who was this young man? Why was he following Jesus? Why was he naked? Why was he draped in a linen cloth instead of wearing normal clothes? And why was the Holy Spirit so careful to include this unique story in Mark’s account of the Gospel? What is the significance of this event? Take a moment today and watch this short clip, I think it will really give you something to THINK ABOUT today!”

The two fold problem with all this:

1) The supposed insight he gives is the height of speculation rather than revelation. To use an analogy from the world of building construction – a sky scraper doctrine is built on a just a dime of real estate.
2) The conclusion reached is complete and utter blasphemy. In this case, Rick Renner states that Jesus raised a naked boy from the dead by accident! Yes! You read that correctly!

R C Sproul summed up the problem well: “Although tradition does not rule our interpretation, it does guide it. If upon reading a particular passage you have come up with an interpretation that has escaped the notice of every other Christian for two-thousand years, or has been championed by universally recognized heretics, chances are pretty good that you had better abandon your interpretation.”

Hermeneutics, Exegesis and the Ordo Salutis

“The ordo salutis, Latin for ‘the order of salvation’ is the theological doctrine that deals with the logical sequencing of the benefits of redemption as we are united to Christ which are applied to us by the Holy Spirit.”

Dr. James White speaks to the issue of a consistent hermeneutic derived from sound exegesis of the Biblical text and takes us on a journey looking closely at the constructions in 1 John 2:29, 1 John 4:7, and 1 John 5:1, then responding to comments made by Leighton Flowers which attempt to avoid the weight of what 1 John 5:1 teaches about faith and regeneration.

Starts at the 40:00 minute mark: