A Thousand Years

We should and must take the Bible literally. But taking the Bible literally does not mean we interpret everything in a wooden or flat way. To take Scripture literally means to take it according to its literature. The Bible contains poetry, prophecy, apocalyptic visions, parables, and historical narrative, and each must be read in light of its genre. Genre plays a huge role in guiding us toward the right interpretation. A failure to do this wreaks havoc in hermeneutics, leading to distortions of meaning and confusion about what God has actually said. For example, when the Psalms tell us that God covers us with His feathers, we do not picture God as a bird. We understand it as poetic imagery meant to communicate His protection. In the same way, when Revelation speaks of dragons, chains, and “a thousand years,” the point is not to read with wooden literalism, but to recognize the symbolic language of apocalyptic literature and let it speak in the way it was meant to.

I once held to dispensational premillennialism, and even taught it at eschatology conferences as far back as the late 1980s. In those circles very little time was given to trace the word “thousand” through the Scriptures. Yet that tracing is essential. The essence of Bible study is not to let our assumptions govern the text, but to let Scripture interpret Scripture. This is what theologians call the analogy of Scripture, the principle that the Bible, being God’s Word, never contradicts itself, and the clearer passages shed light on the more difficult ones. Closely related is the analogy of faith, which reminds us that all of Scripture must be understood in light of the whole system of truth it presents, with Christ at the center. When we apply these principles, we begin to see that the use of “thousand” in Revelation 20 is not isolated or unique, but consistent with the way the Bible elsewhere uses numbers symbolically to convey completeness, vastness, or fullness.

When Dr. Brian Borgman was preaching for us at King’s Church he gave an insightful analogy summarized as follows:

Where we live, the Gardnerville Fairgrounds sits dusty and worn, the air often heavy with the smells of horses, hot dogs, and popcorn. One week they set up a traveling carnival. My grandson, Calvin, spotted the Ferris wheel and begged to go. I promised we would. For several days we drove past the bright lights, and each time I told him to be patient. Finally I said, today is the day. We got in the car and drove, but instead of turning into the fairgrounds, I kept going. Calvin protested, that is what you promised. Be patient, I said. We passed the town limits, then the county line, and his disappointment grew. Hours later we reached Anaheim. I asked him to close his eyes, pulled up to the entrance of Disneyland, and said, open them. He looked up at the castle and the park spread out before him. No one who receives Disneyland would complain that he was promised only the local carnival. When God fulfills His promises in Christ by giving more than we imagined, He has not failed to keep His word. He has fulfilled it in a greater way, a supra fulfillment that points us to the new heavens and the new earth.

This is exactly how Scripture uses the language of a “thousand.” Psalm 50:10 says God owns “the cattle on a thousand hills,” but of course that means all the hills are His. The psalmist is not suggesting a limit, as if hill number 1,001 somehow lies outside of God’s possession. Rather, he is painting a picture of vastness. Every beast in every forest, every herd grazing on every mountain belongs to Him. The word “thousand” here is not arithmetic to be counted, but majesty to be marveled at. It is the language of abundance, meant to remind us that God is not the Lord of part of creation, but the Lord of all creation.

Deuteronomy 7:9 and Psalm 105:8 promise that God’s covenant love extends to a thousand generations. That is not a limit but a picture of unending faithfulness. Deuteronomy 7:9 says, “Know therefore that the Lord your God is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love Him and keep His commandments, to a thousand generations.” If taken literally, it would imply an expiration date on His mercy, which would contradict the very point Moses is making. The phrase stresses permanence and boundlessness. A thousand generations is far longer than the human mind can practically reckon, and the point is that God’s steadfast love endures without end. His covenant loyalty is not fragile or dependent on changing human performance. It is anchored in His own eternal character.

Psalm 84:10 tells us that one day in God’s courts is better than a thousand elsewhere. The point is not arithmetic, but the surpassing joy of being with Him. Psalm 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8 take the language even higher: “a thousand years are like a day” to the Lord, and “a day is like a thousand years.” This is not a conversion chart between God’s time and ours, as if one of His days equals one thousand of our years. If we insist on strict math, we miss the very truth the text is meant to communicate. God is not bound by time at all. He does not experience delay the way we do. He is not aging or waiting, He is not carried along by the stream of history, and He does not measure His purposes by the ticking of our clocks. To the eternal God, what feels to us like long centuries may be as a moment, and what feels to us like a brief breath is eternally present in His sight. His promises are not late and His reign is not slow. His timing is always perfect, because He stands over time itself as the sovereign Lord of history.

And in Revelation 20, the “thousand years” of Christ’s reign fits the same biblical pattern. The number stands for fullness and completeness, not a literal countdown. In fact, everything around the phrase “a thousand years” in Revelation 20 is rich with imagery. Satan is described as a dragon, bound with a great chain, and cast into a bottomless pit. Thrones appear, and the martyrs are seen reigning with Christ. The nations are gathered under the symbolic names Gog and Magog, coming from the four corners of the earth. Fire comes down from heaven to consume the enemies of God. All of these elements show that the language is meant to convey spiritual truths through symbolic pictures. So when John says “a thousand years,” it belongs in the same symbolic category, describing the completeness of Christ’s reign rather than a literal block of time.

The interpretation of the “thousand years” in Revelation 20 as symbolic rather than literal is the general consensus among Reformed theologians. This flows out of covenant theology, the recognition of apocalyptic genre, and the consistent symbolic use of numbers throughout Revelation. From Augustine’s City of God onward, the mainstream Reformed tradition has understood the millennium as describing the present reign of Christ, not a future thousand-year earthly kingdom.

This matches the wider pattern of numbers in Revelation. In Revelation 5:11 John hears the voice of angels “ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands.” That is not meant to be tallied up as 100 million plus a few more. It is a way of saying beyond counting, echoing Daniel 7:10. The number 7, repeated throughout the book, represents perfection and completeness: seven churches, seven seals, seven trumpets, seven bowls. The number 12 speaks of the fullness of God’s people: twelve tribes of Israel, twelve apostles of the Lamb, twelve gates, and twelve foundations in the New Jerusalem. The 144,000 in Revelation 7 and 14 is not a census figure but 12 x 12 x 1,000, a symbolic way of showing the entire redeemed people of God.

So when Revelation speaks of a thousand years, it is consistent with the way numbers function throughout the book. They are symbols pointing us to spiritual realities, not statistics to be added up. The thousand years stands for the fullness of Christ’s reign, the complete accomplishment of God’s purposes in history, and the assurance that all His promises will be perfectly fulfilled.

Put simply, when Scripture speaks of a thousand, it points us to abundance, fullness, and forever. Just as the grandson discovered in Brian Borgman’s illustration that Disneyland was far more than he expected when all he could imagine was a small carnival, so God’s people will discover that His promises in Christ are greater, richer, and more complete than we ever dared to hope.

And this is the encouragement for us: God’s promises are never smaller than they appear, they are always greater. His faithfulness is never cut short, it always endures. What may look to us like delay or distance is, in fact, the outworking of His perfect timing. In Christ we can rest assured that the fulfillment will not disappoint. It will be more than we asked, greater than we imagined, and better than we dared to hope.

R.C. Sproul: Three Questions on his Eschatology

From a Ligonier “Ask R.C. Live” Event (July 2014) beginning at the 36:47 mark:

Transcript:

Questioner (Kathy): Do you believe that we are living in the end times that we read about in the Book of Revelation?

RC: Yes and no. Unless you think I’ve fallen into neo-orthodoxy and paradoxical theology, let me explain that. In one sense, everything that takes place after the ascension of Christ is in the end times. The end times started in the New Testament. We’re still in the end times. Now, I presume, though, what you’re asking me is, are we at the end of the end time so that we’re coming close to the return of Jesus as it was set forth in the Book of Revelation?

Now, one of the big questions in understanding the Book of Revelation, and interpreting the Book of Revelation, is tied to when it was written. The majority report of the dating of the writing of the book Revelation is that it took place in the decade of the 90s of the First century. There has been some significant scholarly work in recent years that argues, and I believe persuasively, that the Book of Revelation was written before the fall of Jerusalem, in the 60s, during the time of Nero, when Nero’s most famous nickname throughout the empire was “the Beast.”

And so the question is, if we could know for sure when the Book of Revelation was written, we would have a better handle on what period of history it was describing. Now, I’m in a minority report here, but in the Olivet discourse in Matthew’s gospel as well as in Luke and Mark is when Jesus talks about the signs of the times, and he talks about the destruction of the temple and the destruction of Jerusalem, and he said, “This generation will not pass away till all of these things are fulfilled.”

Now that phrase has been one of the most hotly debated statements ever to come from Jesus. I went to a liberal seminary, and it seems to me, I didn’t actually, but it seemed that I heard every day in class that Jesus taught that he was coming back within 40 years, and he failed to keep his promise. And that’s one of the reasons why we can’t believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God.

And so in terms of higher critical assaults on the trustworthiness of scripture and the trustworthiness of Jesus, the point of attack is on Jesus’ predictions about the nearness of the coming of the fulfillment of his prophecies there in the Olivet discourse. Notice also the timeframe references that are throughout the Book of Revelation, where it talks about those things that are “near” at hand.

And so the ultimate question is this, were the things that Jesus talking about on the Olivet Discourse and in the Book of Revelation, were those principally pointing to events that were going to take place in the First century, culminating in the destruction of Jerusalem and of the exile of the Jews. That’s one view.

The other view is that all of these things refer to a distant future time, and some people will say what… to both – there was a primary and a secondary, so this becomes very complicated in piecing it all together.

But in any case, however we understand Revelation and when it was written, and what it was referring to, or the Olivet Discourse, we’re still looking forward to the return of Jesus. And he hasn’t come yet.

And as I take great hope and optimism in this, is that every day that passes, he’s that much closer. And when I see what’s going on around us today, I have every reason to think we’re getting closer and closer and closer.

But of course, a lot of that is my hope. And I also realize it could be another 2000 years before he comes. I’m not into making projections, predictions of dates and days or the hours of that sort of thing, but we should certainly be vigilant today, and we should be looking for the coming of Christ.

Lee: And thank you, Kathy. So R.C., you hold to what’s called a partial preterist view, is that correct?

RC: Yes. Not a full Preterist view. Full, the full Preterist teaches that all of the New Testament prophecies regarding the future kingdom and the future company of Christ were all fulfilled in the first century. I don’t believe that. I still think there’s much more to happen, but I also think, and I’m in a minority at this point, I should tell you that, I think that we’ve radically underestimated the significance of what took place in 70 AD and the destruction of Jerusalem.

Lee: So how many chapters of the Book of Revelation do you believe have been fulfilled in that first century prophecy?

RC: Well, it would be most of them up until the last couple chapters when we come to New Heaven and the New Earth and the final consummation of the kingdom of God.

Lee: So, there’s plenty to look forward to in that?

RC: But understand this too, Lee, that in the whole scope of systematic theology, theology is a very broad science. We deal with the doctrine of God, we deal with salvation, sin and the Holy Spirit and Christology. And then we have the science of eschatology, which is study of the last things.

First of all, of all of those different subdivisions of theology, probably the most controversial and the most difficult is eschatology because so much more dealing with future events that we’re not looking back on, and we don’t have the 2020 vision of hindsight.

Secondly, so much of the information about the future prophecies of the New Testament come to us in highly imaginative and symbolic language, which makes it very easy to misunderstand.

Now, when I talk about the different kinds of areas of theology, as a theologian, my confidence and convictions of this doctrine and that doctrine are not always equal. I’m 100% convinced of the doctrine justification by faith alone. Okay? I don’t have any doubts in my mind in that. I don’t have any doubts about the deity of Christ or his substitutionary atonement. Those things are, I have total assurance of, but you asked me about questions in eschatology, and I’ll say, maybe it’s this, maybe it’s that. I don’t have views that are so solidified and cemented I get vehemently dogmatic about it, if you understand what I’m saying.

Lee: Yeah, yeah.