The Moment of Awakening

R.C. Sproul describes the moment of awakening Martin Luther had as he read Romans 1:17, “For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, ‘The righteous shall live by faith.'”

Justification by Faith Alone: Martin Luther and Romans 1:17 from Ligonier Ministries on Vimeo.

Transcript

He says, “Here in it,” in the gospel, “the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith, as it is written, ‘the just shall live by faith.’” A verse taken from the book of Habakkuk in the Old Testament that is cited three times in the New Testament. As Luther would stop short and say, “What does this mean, that there’s this righteousness that is by faith, and from faith to faith? What does it mean that the righteous shall live by faith?” Which again as I said was the thematic verse for the whole exposition of the gospel that Paul sets forth here in the book of Romans.

And so, the lights came on for Luther. And he began to understand that what Paul was speaking of here was a righteousness that God in His grace was making available to those who would receive it passively, not those who would achieve it actively, but that would receive it by faith, and by which a person could be reconciled to a holy and righteous God.

Now there was a linguistic trick that was going on here too. And it was this, that the Latin word for justification that was used at this time in church history was—and it’s the word from which we get the English word justification—the Latin word justificare. And it came from the Roman judicial system. And the term justificare is made up of the word justus, which is justice or righteousness, and the verb, the infinitive facare, which means to make. And so, the Latin fathers understood the doctrine of justification is what happens when God, through the sacraments of the church and elsewhere, makes unrighteous people righteous.

But Luther was looking now at the Greek word that was in the New Testament, not the Latin word. The word dikaios, dikaiosune, which didn’t mean to make righteous, but rather to regard as righteous, to count as righteous, to declare as righteous. And this was the moment of awakening for Luther. He said, “You mean, here Paul is not talking about the righteousness by which God Himself is righteous, but a righteousness that God gives freely by His grace to people who don’t have righteousness of their own.”

And so Luther said, “Woa, you mean the righteousness by which I will be saved, is not mine?” It’s what he called a justitia alienum, an alien righteousness; a righteousness that belongs properly to somebody else. It’s a righteousness that is extra nos, outside of us. Namely, the righteousness of Christ. And Luther said, “When I discovered that, I was born again of the Holy Ghost. And the doors of paradise swung open, and I walked through.”

Not God, Not Christ

and I will never forget him.

After his death in 1976, my dad, who was his pastor, received Prof. Smith’s personal New Testament. Upon my dad’s death in 2007, I received this same New Testament. I find it marked up by Prof. Smith in personal ways.

For example, on the Romans 8 page, where the King James Version says, “Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God’s elect?”, Smith jotted in the margin, “Not God!” And where it says, “Who is he that condemneth?”, he noted, “Not Christ!”

Does that seem too obvious to mention? To me, it is significant. Here’s how. Smith’s clear this-and-not-that way of thinking is categorical, even simple, and very apostolic. When I listen to some preachers, it’s not just that I disagree with their conclusions; it’s that I disagree with their mode of thinking. Not all considerations in theology are blindingly obvious. But then, when we preach, we do not make those more difficult matters our great message. We are not there to proclaim a grand maybe-ism. The apostles certainly weren’t. We are there, as they were, to declare a sure word of hope to desperate people for whom everything is on the line. They need to hear a word from God himself, through us, that this is what the gospel is, and that isn’t. Then their hearts can come to rest in the authority of it.

People need and deserve apostolic clarity.

Justification Quotes

judge-gavelIn the New Testament, words for salvation include: propitiation, vitally important for understanding the nature of the atonement yet only mentioned four times; Reconciliation is found just five times (all Pauline); and Redemption is not very common. But when we come to justification, we have 81 occurrences of the adjective, 100+ of the noun, 39 of the verb, and 5 of the adverb. Justification could be called the central idea in the doctrine of salvation.

John Calvin (1509-1564), “Justification is the main hinge on which salvation turns.”

Martin Luther (1483-1546), “When the article of justification has fallen, everything has fallen … This is the chief article from which all other doctrines have flowed … It alone begets, nourishes, builds, preserves, and defends the church of God; and without it the church of God cannot exist for one hour. Justification is the master and prince, the lord, the ruler, and the judge over all kinds of doctrines.”

Thomas Cranmer (1489-1556), “Justification is the strong rock and foundation of Christian religion. Whosoever denies this doctrine is not to be counted for a true Christian man but an adversary of Christ.”

John Stott, “Justification is not a synonym for amnesty, which is pardon without principle, a forgiveness which overlooks – even forgets – wrongdoing and declines to bring it to justice. No. Justification is an act of justice… When God justifies sinners, He is not declaring bad people to be good, or saying that they are not sinners after all; He is pronouncing them legally righteous, free from any liability to the broken law, because He Himself in His Son has borne the penalty of their law-breaking. We are justified by His blood.”