The Five Solas (Article)

Dr. Kim Riddlebarger’s article on the Five Solas – original source:

https://www.kimriddlebarger.com/the-riddleblog/4hrw7xxpbm28ki7w3cqa0y4l4jw8io

The Five Solas of the Protestant Reformation

Many churches which trace their theological ancestry back to the Protestant Reformation, commemorate Reformation Day. October 31, 1517, is the traditional date when Martin Luther, a young biblical scholar and troubled son of the Roman church, nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Castle Church in the city of Wittenberg. Professor Luther sought to challenge the Roman church’s understanding of the sacrament of penance. The act of posting written theses (objections) was simply the way in which professors of that day called for academic debate.

Luther was as surprised as anyone when his 95 Theses gave voice those to countless German peasants who felt that the Roman church had grown increasing greedy, corrupt, and indifferent to their needs. When the Dominican friar Johann Tetzel came through Germany selling indulgences–which supposedly shortened the time that a sinner spent in purgatory–ordinary Germans were outraged. How dare Rome send an emissary into Germany to sell indulgences at a time of great economic hardship, especially when the proceeds from the sale went to pay for the construction of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome–a grand church which no German peasant would ever see.

While German peasants hated the Roman church because of the church’s arrogance and indifference, for Luther, the issues were theological. When Luther’s theses were published and quickly disseminated across much of Germany, it soon became clear that this was not just a debate about a fine point of doctrine (penance), but a fundamental challenge to the nature of religious authority as understood by the Roman Catholic Church. This was, in fact, a direct challenge to Rome’s teaching on good works, merit, faith, and the nature of the gospel. It was not long before Protestantism was a wide-spread movement and a burgeoning theological threat to the Roman church–especially in northern Europe. Although Protestantism soon separated into Lutheran and Reformed branches, the Protestant objections to Rome quickly crystalized around the so-called “five Solas” of the Reformation. These five “onlys” include: Scripture alone, grace alone, Christ alone, faith alone, and glory to God alone.

The Roman church believed Scripture was God’s word. But Rome didn’t see Scripture as the primary ground of religious authority–there was also church tradition as an equal authority. The Roman church believed in grace, but defined grace as a substance dispensed through the sacramental system of the church, and that such grace must be energized by the human will in order to be effective in matters of salvation. Rome militantly defended the deity of Christ and his sacrificial death for sins. But Rome taught that the merit of human good works must be added to the merits of Christ in order for sinners to be made right with God (justification). Rome also taught that faith was an essential Christian virtue, but understood that simple faith must be formed into an active faith which then produced those Christian virtues and good works which merited (earned) favor from God. While in theory the Roman church gave all glory to God, in practice, Rome’s theology spread glory around to Mary, the papacy, the church, the saints, and even to human good works.

What has separated Protestantism from Rome since 1517, is not Scripture, grace, faith, Christ, or glory to God. What caused the great divide between Protestants and Catholics was the Protestant insistence upon that little adjective “sola” or “only.” Scripture alone. Grace alone. Christ alone. Faith alone. Glory to God alone.

Sola Scriptura

The so-called formal principle of the Protestant Reformation, sola Scriptura is the affirmation that Scripture alone–not the church’s officers, not religious tradition, nor personal experience–is the sole authority for Christian faith and practice.

Sola Scriptura presupposes the fact that God is transcendent and remains completely hidden from us, unless and until he reveals himself to us. God reveals himself in two ways (Psalm 19). The first way is through the so-called book of nature (the natural order). But because we are sinful and fallible, we inevitably distort the revelation God gives in nature (Ephesians 4:18-24). We suppress the truth in unrighteousness and inevitably end-up turning natural revelation into false religion and idolatry (Romans 1:18-32).

Since God is gracious and intends to save his people from their sins, God stoops down (as it were) to reveal himself to us not only in nature, but also in history. God does this through the great and mighty acts of redemption which we find recorded in Holy Scripture, along with his word of explanation about how we are to understand these events (John 20:30-31). Scripture even helps us understand God’s revelation in nature correctly (Psalm 19:1).

Not only does the Bible (the word of God written) confront us with bad news of human sin (Romans 3:9-20), but in the Bible (and only in the Bible) we find the good news of gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-6). The gospel reveals to us those things which God has done in the person of Jesus Christ to save us from our sins. This includes Christ’s death and resurrection, but also in his perfect and personal obedience in which he fulfills all of the demands that God places upon us in the Ten Commandments (Romans 5:12-21). We can’t find this good news in nature. We can’t find this good news inside our own souls. And we don’t find it in the world’s religions.

Since we cannot discover the gospel on our own, God graciously reveals it to us in the words of Holy Scripture. Indeed Scripture itself testifies to its own inspiration—“men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:19-21); “all Scripture is God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:15-17). The Reformation era confessions and catechisms remind us of what the Bible declares about itself, and then explain to us how in Scripture, God has given us everything we need to know about how to find God’s will and purpose for our lives, as well as the infallible source of knowledge about the saving work of Jesus Christ.

Since God has revealed everything we need to know about our sin and our salvation in his word (Deuteronomy 29:29), Protestants see no need for an infallible church, infallible church officers (the papacy), or continuing revelation (as in Pentecostalism). What could God have possibly left out of his word that we need to know about Jesus and his person and work that we don’t already know? (cf. John 20:30-31)

While the Bible doesn’t tell us everything about life (many mistakenly think of the Bible as the key to the mysteries of the universe, the owner’s manual to life, or as a book of timeless truths like Aesop’s Fables), the Bible does tell us what Jesus has done to save us from our sins. And that is what we mean when we refer to sola Scriptura. There is no other infallible source about the grace of God and good news of the gospel other than God’s word written.

Sola Gratia

The biblical picture of human nature is vastly different from that held dear by most Americans, who see themselves and their neighbors as basically “good people.” As Americans, we have imbibed deeply from the well of the Enlightenment. The famous dictum of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant that the Enlightenment has liberated us from the past–all human tradition, authority structures, and from religious dogma–means that truth is to be found within, as pure reason is employed by the self. Having accepted Kant’s dictum (without even knowing it), Americans are incredibly optimistic about human nature, and the power of the self to discover truth–especially when it comes to religion, which is now relegated to the heart, something completed divorced from anything external, like the authority of the church, or Scripture. Scripture gives way to feeling. Faith is divorced from reason. Piety is now “spirituality.” The “subjective turn” (truth is personal and found within) means there are as many different religions as there are Americans.

While there is a relative sense in which we can say that people are basically good (a civic righteousness), the Bible, on the other hand, depicts men and women as divine image bearers who are like God in every way that a creature can be like God, but who have tragically fallen into sin (Genesis 2:4-3:24). The glorious image of God remains in us but only in a defaced form (Genesis 9:6; James 3:9). The Bible speaks of the human race as dead in sin, and as sinners who need to be saved from the guilt and power of sin (Ephesians 2:1-10). The Bible tells us that in addition to being guilty for our own sins, we are also guilty for Adam’s sin, since God chose the first man to represent the entire human race which descends from him (Romans 5:12-21). This is what we mean when we speak of original sin. There is absolutely nothing we can do to save ourselves from our horrible predicament into which we are born. We are lost. We are rebels. We prefer the optimistic picture Kant paints of us, but only because this is a complete and total rejection of how the Bible describes fallen human nature–as sinful, and unable to do anything pleasing before God (Romans 3:9-20).

Taking the biblical account seriously, Protestants saw humanity as a race of rebels, who have fallen and cannot get up. Our situation is dire. We are guilty before God. We are unable to come to God on our own. We sin because we like to sin. And when the Bible tells us the truth about our predicament we don’t like it. In fact, we resent it.

Enter a gracious God. Sola gratia is the notion that God, in his grace, takes pity on Adam’s fallen race, and not only provides what is necessary for our salvation–the saving work of Jesus Christ–but that while we were still sinners and openly rebelling against him, God nevertheless comes to us through the gospel, regenerates us, calls us to faith in Christ, and then forgives us of our sins, even reckoning to us the perfect righteousness of Jesus Christ as a free gift (Romans 8:28-30). God does this because he is gracious, not because we are deserving.

By the phrase Sola gratia we understand that God acts upon the hearts of sinners who are dead in sin, and who do not deserve, nor wish to be saved. Dead people cannot resurrect themselves, nor do anything to save themselves. But God can and does make us alive in Christ, and that from that moment on, we trust his wonderful promises to save us from our the guilt of our sins, and so that we desire to live lives which bring him glory.

Solus Christus

When we say that our salvation is based in the grace of God, we mean that our salvation begins with something good in God, not with something good which God sees in us which makes us worth saving (Jeremiah 17:9). If we are a race of fallen sinners, we require a Savior, someone who can come and do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Guilty sinners cannot declare themselves “not guilty” in a court and then leave the court cleared of all charges because they declared themselves “not guilty” (Acts 10:42). A jury and a judge must first render a verdict. As Adam’s descendants, the verdict has already come in–we are guilty as charged on all counts (Romans 3:23). If God decrees to save us, then we must have a Savior. And this Savior must save us in such a way as to satisfy the demands of God’s holy justice, and yet in such a way as to display God’s boundless love for sinners (Hebrews 4:14-16).

As someone wiser than I once put it, “grace has a face.” God’s grace is manifest in the person and work of Jesus Christ who came into the world to save sinners (1 Timothy 12:17). Because it was God’s intention to save a vast multitude of Adam’s fallen race from every tribe and tongue under heaven (Revelation 7:9), God sent Jesus Christ (the second person of the Holy Trinity) to take to himself a true human nature and come to earth, miraculously conceived by the Holy Spirit, and born of a virgin (Matthew 1:18-25). Jesus came to do what the first Adam failed to do. Someone must obey all of God’s commands, yet without sin (1 Peter 2:22). It is Jesus who provides that sacrifice which turns aside God’s wrath and anger toward our sins (Romans 5:8-9).

This is why Jesus is truly human, yet born without sin. This is why over the course of his life, Jesus humbles himself and suffers among us, all the while completely obedient to all of God’s commandments, in thought, in word, and deed. This is why Jesus kept telling his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem to suffer and die–something they kept trying to talk him out of doing (Matthew 20:17-19).

But on Good Friday, Jesus did die at the hands of the Romans, and the Bible tells us with great specificity why. When Jesus died upon the cross he was bearing in his own flesh the wrath of God toward our sins (Romans 5:6-10). His final words, “it is finished” declare the glorious truth. Jesus is dying for his people, all those who trust in that death to save them on the day of judgment. Jesus is being punished, for us, and in our place. It is truly the wonder of wonders that the son of God became a son of man, so that the sons of men, might becomes sons and daughters of God.

But a dead savior is not a true savior. He is but a mere claimant. That is why on the third day, the first Easter Sunday, God raised Jesus from the dead (Matthew 28). Not only does this mean that Jesus’ sacrifice accomplished God’s intended purpose–to provide a payment for sin which satisfies his holy justice by paying for the guilt of our sins (1 Peter 2:24)–the empty tomb also means God has conquered death and the grave and destroyed the consequences of Adam’s sinful transgression. When Jesus died and rose again, so too, God’s people are promised the same thing on the last day, when they are spared from the day of judgment and are raised imperishable to live forever (1 Corinthians 15:12-57).

When Protestants affirm solus Christus, we are affirming that Jesus Christ did everything necessary for a sinner to be saved. Those who trust in Jesus are saved by God, from God. In Christ’s obedience God provides us with a perfect righteousness, and in his death, God provides us with a once for all sacrifice for sin. There is no other Savior but solus Christus!

Sola Fide

When we speak of solus Christus, we speak of a Savior (Jesus) who has done everything necessary to save us from our sins. His death satisfies God’s holy justice (Romans 3:21-28). His death is sufficient to pay for the guilt of all my sins, past, present, and future. His death reconciles sinners to God (2 Corinthians 5:18-20) and sets forth both God’s infinite love as well as his perfect justice (1 John 4:10 with John 3:16-17). Furthermore, Jesus also lived a life of perfect obedience to the commandments of God, something none of Adam’s fallen children could do. In Christ Jesus is found everything sinners need to be reconciled unto God.

But how do these wonderful works and merits of Christ become mine? Is there some ceremony I must perform? Is there some vow I must make? Is there some pilgrimage to a holy place? Or is there a journey of self-discovery I must make to so as figure it all out? Can I find Christ within? Can I find Christ outside of Scripture?

From the earliest days of the Reformation, Protestants pointed to those countless biblical passages which speak of faith alone as the means through which Christ’s wonderful benefits become mine (i.e., Romans 3:21-31; Galatians 2:16, 3:10-11; 3:25-26; Philippians 3:3-10). Many of these passages are cited in Reformation era confessions and catechisms, as in questions 21, 60, and 61 of the Heidelberg Catechism. It is not as though sola fide is some odd quirky personal opinion of Martin Luther. Sola fide is the clear teaching of the New Testament, and was tragically buried by layers of legal opinion (Canon law) and theological obfuscation by the Roman Church. When Luther read Paul’s Epistle to the Romans directly from the Greek text in which it had been written, it were as though centuries of mud and dirt had been washed from a newly discovered work of art which had been lost and long forgotten.

Luther now understood, quite correctly, that the only way that Christ’s merits become mine is when I stop trying to earn favor with God, and simply trust God’s promise. Christ’s saving benefits become mine only when I stop looking within, or stop looking in places other than where Christ is revealed. All God asks me to do is stop trying to save myself, and then through faith in his promise to save me, trust that Jesus’ life and death are indeed sufficient to save me from my sins.

Faith is the act of trusting that Jesus’ merits are enough to save me when I stand before God in the judgment (Romans 4:1-8). Sola fide is the expression used when we confess that we are not trusting in our good works, our virtue, our church, our piety, or any other such thing (Romans 3:28). Sola fide simply means trusting in Christ alone. Christ plus nothing. Christ minus nothing.

Americans have a hard time believing this. We think we are good people. We are rugged and capable. We want God to tell us what to do and then let us do it. Instead, God says stop doing. Trust me. Renounce all your efforts to earn my favor, stop trying to work your way into heaven, and simply accept by faith what I offer as a free gift–the merits of Christ (Luke 5:32).

In the person of his son, God offers the complete forgiveness of all our sins and a perfect righteousness which can withstand his holy gaze on the day of judgment. And this free gift is accepted with the empty hands of faith, which is a humble but hearty trust in the promises of an all-powerful and gracious God to save even me.

Soli Deo Gloria

So, at the end of the day, where do we find true happiness? Do we find it in our accumulated wealth and possessions? Do we find it in our personal accomplishments? Or, having grasped the depths of our sin, and the glories of the gospel, do we find our true happiness in God’s glorious provision to save us from our sins? (cf. Matthew 6:19-21; Ephesians 1:16-23). Soli Deo Gloria is that Reformation slogan which sums up all the others. When we profess glory to God alone, we are attributing to God all glory, majesty, and honor. For these attributes are rightly his–these honors cannot be rightly attributed to popes, saints, or sinners. When we confess Soli Deo Gloria, we are simply thanking God for all that he has done for us in Christ. We are attributing to him that honor due that one alone who have saved us from all our sins.

When Martin Luther challenged the Roman doctrine of penance, he unleashed a pent-up force which shook all of Europe. When Luther discovered that the Latin translation of the verb “do penance” was really “repent” in the Greek text of the New Testament, Luther understood for the first time that the gospel wasn’t about our doing anything. Luther began to see with greater and greater clarity what Protestants now often take for granted. The gospel was all about what God has done for us in the person of his Son. We simply come before God as needy beggars and humbly receive the benefits that Christ freely gives to us.

When Luther articulated the doctrine of justification by grace alone, through faith alone, on account of Christ alone, Luther directed struggling sinners to seek peace for their souls in the saving work of a gracious God, and not in the church’s ability to dispense grace though a man-made system of penance and priestcraft, which completely obscured God’s grace in Christ. This not only set sinners free from the church, but the Reformation changed every aspect of life.

Indeed, as the Protestant Reformation took root across Europe and then spread to the new world, God’s people began to realize that having been set free from their sins, they were also set free to do all things in life not out of fear, or servitude, but to bring God all honor and praise. Life itself was to be lived before God (corem Deo), through the blessings of Christ. No priests must intervene. No indulgences were required. Every believer was now a priest with equal access before God, because of the intercession of Christ, the great high priest (Hebrews 10:19-25). As Luther pointed out, every believer was now free to pursue their own calling and vocation, whether that be raising children, making shoes, running a business, or tilling the soil–all with the knowledge that in Christ, God blesses their daily labors. The grateful heart inevitably directs its praise and worship to God. To God alone be the glory.

No wonder that Soli Deo Gloria became an expression of gratitude throughout the Protestant world. J. S. Bach and G. F. Handel included the initials SDG on their major compositions. Public buildings and Protestant homes and personal effects bore this affirmation of praise, as did Protestant churches. A redeemed sinner cannot help but agree with the words of Shakespeare. “That word grace, on the lips of an ungrateful person is profanity.”

So, whenever we consider our plight before God, and then recall all that God has done to save us form our sins, how can our hearts not well-up with emotion, and the desire to confess yet again Soli Deo Gloria. Gloria to God alone.

The Five Solas (Revisited)

Written by Dr. Keith Mathison, professor of systematic theology at Reformation Bible College – (original source – https://reformationbiblecollege.org/blog/the-five-solas)

A few years ago, I ran across a comic strip in which one of the figures says, “Those who don’t study history are doomed to repeat it. Yet those who do study history are doomed to stand by helplessly while everyone else repeats it.” This comic is a humorous, albeit somewhat cynical, play on the well-known quote by American philosopher George Santayana (1863–1952), who wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” It is a well-known and widely used quote because there is much truth in it.

The truth that Santayana grasped is abundantly illustrated in the history of the modern evangelical church. We are a people who have forgotten our roots, and in many cases, we really don’t seem to care. The church exists in a world of rapidly changing technology, a world in which almost everyone has been assimilated into the incessant chatter of social media and real-time updates on everything from world politics to what your friend had for breakfast this morning. If we are to be relevant, or so we think, we too must be a people of the new and the now.

The consequences of such ideas in the church are there for all to see. Numerous polls indicate widespread biblical and theological illiteracy. Numerous professing Christians do not grasp the contents of Scripture. Those who have read the Bible often have no idea what it means and how the various parts go together. A recent study sponsored by Ligonier Ministries indicates that a large percentage of professing Christians unwittingly hold views regarding the Trinity, Jesus Christ, sin, and salvation that are technically heretical.

We are not in a good place, but we are not the first to be in such a position. The people of Israel forgot the past with disastrous consequences. The medieval church forgot the past with disastrous consequences. But what do you do when you realize you’ve taken a wrong turn somewhere along your journey? You go back and seek to find the correct path. We should not view the past as something that is gone and therefore useless. We should look at the past more like the way someone on the second floor of a building looks at the foundation. The foundation was built before the remaining structure. It was built in the past. But the foundation is not something that can be discarded without catastrophic results.

In this article, I want to look briefly at some of the old paths, some foundational doctrines—namely, the five solas of the Reformation (sola Scriptura, sola fide, sola gratia, solus Christus, soli Deo gloria). When the medieval church lost her way, the rediscovery of these fundamental doctrines during the Reformation helped the church regain her footing.

Sola Scriptura

What do we mean when we say that we believe in sola Scriptura, or Scripture alone? Like all of the solas, a proper understanding of the doctrine requires a certain amount of context—both historical and theological. In the first place, we need to understand that the Reformation doctrine of sola Scriptura arose within the context of the late medieval Roman Catholic church and its teaching. It was a response to perceived error in the teaching of the church. So what was it that the Reformers found objectionable?

The dispute with Rome was not over the inspiration or inerrancy of Scripture. Rome affirmed both doctrines. The problem, instead, was due to the fact that over the course of many centuries, Rome had gradually adopted a view of the relation between the church, Scripture, and tradition that effectively placed final authority somewhere other than God. Tradition was conceived of as a second source of revelation, and the pope and Roman magisterium were viewed as the final authority in matters of faith and practice.

The Reformers wanted to call the church back to a view of the relation between Scripture and tradition that was found in the early church. They believed that the Bible itself taught such a view. The Reformation doctrine of sola Scriptura, or the Reformation doctrine of the relation between Scripture and tradition, affirms that Scripture is to be understood as the sole source of divine revelation, the only inspired, infallible, final, and authoritative norm of faith and practice. Why? Because Scripture is “God-breathed” (2 Tim. 3:16). In other words, what Scripture says, God says. There is, therefore, a basic ontological difference between Scripture (God’s Word) and any creaturely words. Scripture is metaphysically unique. Scripture is to be interpreted in and by the church, and it is to be interpreted within the hermeneutical context of the rule of faith (Acts 15).

Among evangelicals, there is a common misunderstanding of sola Scriptura that views the Bible not only as the sole final authority, but as the sole authority altogether. In other words, the church, the ecumenical creeds, the confessions of faith, are largely dismissed even as secondary authorities. It is the “No creed but Christ” or “No creed but the Bible” attitude so prevalent in the church today. Of course, those who assert such slogans fail to realize that a statement such as “No creed but Christ” is itself a creed—a statement of what one believes.

Those who espouse this misunderstanding of the Reformation doctrine are often unaware that it is not the view of the early church and it is not the view of the magisterial Reformers. In fact, where one most often encounters this view historically is in the writings of various heretics (e.g., the Arians of the early church, the Socinians of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, etc.). This bad version of biblicism has been the source of innumerable false doctrines.

Sola Fide

Often referred to as “the material cause” of the Reformation, the doctrine of justification sola fide (by faith alone) was a key point of debate between the Protestant Reformers and the Roman Catholic Church in the sixteenth century, and it has remained a point of disagreement ever since. Martin Luther and his followers expressed the importance of the doctrine of justification by faith alone by teaching that it is “the article by which the church stands or falls.” Was Luther correct in affirming the central importance of this doctrine? In order to answer this question, we must grasp the meaning of justification itself as well as the differences between the Protestant and Roman Catholic doctrines.

The Roman Catholic doctrine of justification is most clearly expressed in the Decree Concerning Justification produced in the Sixth Session of the Council of Trent in 1547. According to this Decree, fallen human beings are “made just” through the “laver of regeneration.” In short, the instrumental cause of justification (being made just) is baptism. Justification is said to involve remission of sins and “also the sanctification and renewal of the inward man.” Justification is not by faith alone, according to the Council of Trent, because hope and charity (i.e. love) must be added.

The Reformers rejected the idea that justification means “making just” by a faith that is not alone and that it is accomplished through the instrument of baptism. But why? In order to answer that question, we must have some understanding of the basic issues underlying the debate. The first point to observe is that God is absolutely just and righteous, and He will judge the world in righteousness. So, what is the problem with this? The problem is that although God is perfectly just and righteous, we are not. We are fallen, sinful, unjust, and unrighteous creatures (Rom. 3:9–18). This raises an infinitely serious question for each of us: How can I, an unjust sinner, stand before our infinitely righteous and holy God at the final judgment?

Rome offered one answer. In order for a person to be declared righteous by God, he or she first has to be made righteous by God. As we saw above, justification for Rome means to be “made just.” The following is something of an oversimplification of a much more complicated doctrine, but at its heart, the Roman doctrine of justification includes the idea of sanctification and renewal. The grounds of justification, the basis upon which the declaration of righteousness is made, therefore, is an infused righteousness. It is a grace that is infused, or poured, into our souls. If a person cooperates with this infused grace, he or she is renewed and sanctified. The person cooperating with grace, therefore, has an inherent righteousness. One can lose this state of grace through mortal sin. However, if this happens, the sacrament of penance is a means by which a person can be restored to a state of justification.

According to the Reformers, there were serious problems with the Roman doctrine. In the first place, the standard of God’s judgment is absolutely perfect righteousness (Matt. 5:48). He cannot require less without denying Himself and His own holiness. A person cannot be declared righteous and survive the judgment of God, therefore, on the grounds of anything less than perfection. Since the fall of Adam and Eve, however, only one man has ever lived a life of perfect righteousness, and that One is Jesus Christ (Heb. 4:15). The Reformers argued, therefore, in opposition to Rome’s idea of infusion for a doctrine of double imputation. To impute something means to reckon it legally. The doctrine of double imputation means that our sin is imputed to Christ and His righteousness is imputed to us (2 Cor. 5:21).

It is also important to note here that for Rome, justification is by faith, but it is not by faith alone. For Rome, faith is necessary, but faith is not sufficient. Recall that for Rome, the instrumental cause of justification is baptism. The Reformers argued, on the contrary, that the sole instrument of justification is faith, and that even this faith is a gift of God. It is by grace (Rom. 3:28; 5:1; Eph. 2:8).

The Reformed doctrine of justification is clearly expressed in the classic Reformed confessions and catechisms of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The Westminster Larger Catechism, for example, provides a concise statement of the biblical doctrine:

Question 70: What is justification?

Answer: Justification is an act of God’s free grace unto sinners, in which he pardons all their sins, accepts and accounts their persons righteous in his sight; not for any thing wrought in them, or done by them, but only for the perfect obedience and full satisfaction of Christ, by God imputed to them, and received by faith alone.

Sola Gratia

In the early fifth century, a theological controversy occurred that would forever shape the thinking of the church. In his Confessions, Augustine of Hippo wrote in the form of a prayer the words: “Give what Thou commandest and command what Thou will.” The British monk Pelagius was upset by these words, believing that they would give Christians an excuse for not obeying God. Pelagius believed that if God commanded something then man was naturally (apart from grace) able to do it. He believed that this was possible because he also believed that Adam’s sin had only affected Adam. All human beings are born in the same state in which Adam was born, capable of either obeying God or disobeying him. If they obey, their good works merit salvation. If not, they deserve God’s punishment.

Augustine, on the other hand, taught that Adam’s sin had dramatically impacted all of his descendants. The Reformed churches followed Augustine in their rejection of Pelagianism. The Westminster Confession of Faith, for example, has a clear explanation of the doctrine of original sin. By our first parents’ sin:

They fell from their original righteousness and communion, with God, and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the parts and faculties of soul and body. They being the root of all mankind, the guilt of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and corrupted nature conveyed, to all their posterity descending from them by ordinary generation. From this original corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do proceed all actual transgressions (VI.1–4).

Since the fall, all human beings are born in this fallen state with their will (one of the faculties of soul and body) in bondage to sin. Because of the fall, we are born spiritually dead, unable to choose or will the good (Rom. 3:10–12; 5:6; Eph. 2:1).

Although Pelagianism was condemned as a heresy at a number of councils, including the third ecumenical council in 431, it has raised its head in various forms ever since. By the late medieval period, the Roman Catholic Church had fallen into a type of semi-Pelagianism. The justification of the sinner was seen as a kind of synergistic, co-operative work between God and the sinner. The doctrine of sola gratia was the Protestant response to this.

The Protestant doctrine of sola gratia is found in all of the major Reformed confessions. It underlies everything said regarding the state of the fallen sinner, election, calling, regeneration, conversion, justification, and more. The point that the Reformers wanted to make in the sixteenth century is the same point that Augustine made in the fifth. We are not saved by pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps. The fallen sinner is not a drowning man who merely needs to do his part by reaching out to grab the life preserver tossed by God. No, the sinner is in a far more serious condition. He cannot grab a life preserver because he is not merely drowning. He is a cold, dead, lifeless corpse on the bottom of the sea. If he is to be saved, he will not be able to cooperate with God. His salvation will be an act of pure grace, and grace alone, on the part of God (Eph. 2:8).

Solus Christus

When we discuss the Reformation slogan solus Christus, it is important to understand the precise point of dispute. The Reformers did not reject the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrine of the person of Christ. Nicene Trinitarianism and Chalcedonian Christology were not the issue, and the theologians of the Reformed churches readily used the biblical and theological arguments of patristic and medieval theologians to defend traditional Trinitarianism and Christology.

The problem, then, was not the person of Christ. The problem was the work of Christ. The debate centered on the sacramental system that Rome had constructed, a system in which the grace of Christ was mediated to the people through an elaborate system of priests and sacramental works. Through this sacramental system, the Roman church effectively controlled the Christian’s life from birth (baptism) to death (extreme unction) and even beyond (masses for the dead).

Martin Luther and other Reformers realized that this elaborate system of works obscured the person and work of Christ as it was so clearly taught in Scripture. Luther argued that the papacy, through this sacramental system, had usurped the prerogatives of Christ, making itself the dispenser of God’s grace. Christ alone, and not the church, is our only Mediator (Westminster Larger Catechism Q. 181). As Huldrych Zwingli proclaimed, “Christ is the only way of salvation of all who were, are now, or shall be.” In Article 54 of his Sixty-Seven Articles (1523), Zwingli explicitly contrasts the Roman sacramentalist view with solus Christus: “Christ has borne all our pain and travail. Hence, whoever attributes to works of penance what is Christ’s alone, errs and blasphemes God.” The Westminster Confession of Faith affirms that Christ alone is the object of our faith: “the principal acts of saving faith are accepting, receiving, and resting upon Christ alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life, by virtue of the covenant of grace” (XIV.2).

The Reformers and their heirs were intent on proclaiming Jesus Christ and Him crucified (1 Cor. 2:2). They recognized that because Christ is the only way of salvation for man, He is central to the message of the Bible (Acts 4:12). Their books were Christ-centered. Their sermons were Christ-centered. Their worship was Christ-centered. All of this was in stark contrast to the man-centered religion of late medieval Roman Catholicism. If we are to see a new Reformation in our day, we too must believe and confess the biblical doctrine of solus Christus.

Soli Deo Gloria

Soli Deo gloria is not precisely parallel to the other four solas because in one sense, it is both the beginning and the end of the other four. The Holy Spirit inspired the Scriptures to the glory of God alone. Christ humbled Himself to the point of death and was raised and exalted to the right hand of the Father to the glory of God alone. Grace and mercy are offered to rebellious sinners to the glory of God alone. Justification is by faith alone to the glory of God alone. Soli Deo gloria, therefore, is central.

It is important to understand that when we talk about God’s glory, we are talking first and foremost about an attribute of God. As the Westminster Confession of Faith explains: “God hath all life, glory, goodness, blessedness, in and of Himself.” He is the God of glory (Acts 7:2). He also manifests His glory in the works of creation and redemption, most significantly in the person and work of Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory (1 Cor. 2:8).

God also glorifies Himself in and through the church. We as believers are called to do whatever we do to the glory of God (1 Cor. 10:31). We are to use our gifts to serve one another “in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 4:10–11). The Psalms are filled from beginning to end with ascriptions of praise to the glory of God, and this demonstrates where the focus of the church’s worship should be. Worship does not exist for our entertainment. Worship exists for the glory of God alone.

A rediscovery of the five solas of the Reformation is an important part of getting back on the right path.