616, the Number of the Beast?

Daniel B. Wallace, Ph.D writes:

There has been a flurry of interest in the number of the Beast in Canadian and American newspapers of late. The reason for the interest is that the Beast’s number might not be 666.

A few years ago, a papyrus of Revelation was discovered. It was badly damaged, having only about twenty fragments that spanned nine chapters. One fragment, in particular, is of interest. About the size of a postage stamp, it includes part of Revelation 13.18. There we read, “This calls for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the beast’s number, for it is man’s number, and his number is 666” (NET Bible). But the papyrus (known as P115) has a different number here: 616.

I saw the fragment four years ago at the Ashmolean Museum of Oxford University. It was published over six years ago; just now it is making its way into popular literature as though it were a new discovery. When I looked at the fragment, the curator had to slice open its case because the verse in question was on the backside. He told me that no one had asked to see the fragment since it had been published. I looked at it under a microscope to make sure that the wording had not been tampered with. But even with the naked eye, it was quite legible. I am inclined to the view that the original wording here was 616, but a lot of work is needed to determine this. Although this is the earliest fragment for this portion of Revelation (third or fourth century), the fragment’s textual affinities and general reliability still need to be examined fully.

Further, the number 616 was known in antiquity and was discarded in the second century. Irenaeus, the patristsic commentator, wrote a chapter on the number of the beast, arguing that in the better manuscripts of Revelation that he had seen the number was 666 instead of 616. To be sure, his perspective was theologically motivated (he gave the interpretation of 666 as striving for perfection [represented by the number 7] but never able to achieve it). But the fact that he was writing in the second century tells us that BOTH numbers existed at that time. It may well have been Irenaeus’ input that caused scribes to alter the text to 666 if 616 was in the exemplar that they used.

Indeed, we know of one other manuscript (Codex C, from the fifth century) that has 616, and two others used to exist (codices 5 and 11) that had this number. But the point here is that one cannot simply appeal to the earliest manuscript and assume that the case is settled. Textual criticism is not done in such a simplistic manner. Date is indeed important, but there are several other factors involved. The Center for the Study of New TestamentManuscripts has begun to investigate whether this is the authentic number of Revelation. It will take scores of hours of research, and the results will not be certain. But if 616 is indeed the number of the beast, it will certainly have interesting implications. In the least, it will send seven tons of popular Christian literature to the flames!

Central in Eschatology

“We emphasize truths as central which are central in Scripture. The prophecy that Jesus will return is central. The prophecy that there will be a Day of Judgment is central. Details concerning a coming great tribulation, the potential timing and character of a rapture, the interpretation of the Beast from the Sea and of the antichrist, the timing and character of the millennium are all clearly not central. It is legitimate to have opinions about these matters. It is illegitimate to use one’s opinions about these questions to define what orthodox Christianity is, to divide churches, and to exclude Christians from ministry positions. In view of the fact that orthodox Christians have held different positions for centuries, it is foolish, even arrogant, to insist on the absolute truth of one’s position on these surely minor questions.” – Eckhard Schnabel (professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School), 40 Questions About The End Times, 312-313

“The early Christians prayed that Jesus might come back soon. They believed that Jesus’ return was imminent, allowing for the possibility that this might happen during their lifetime. Yet, they never mention a time frame within which Jesus would return. They never calculate how close the end might be. They never set a date. They waited, but they did not speculate. They did not make false predictions: Jesus could indeed have returned in the first century, after Jerusalem and the temple had been destroyed. At the same time, the early Christians knew that Jesus’ return might be delayed. Jesus repeatedly spoke about a delay and about the fact that his return would be sudden and unexpected. This must be our attitude as well if we heed Jesus’ exhortation and the apostles’ anticipation: we eagerly wait for Jesus’ return, we do not speculate about dates, and we do the work of the Lord in the meantime, until he comes back.” – Schnabel, 40 Questions About The End Times, 261

The Suffering Servant of Isaiah

One of the most clear Bible prophecies that has already been fulfilled concerns Isaiah’s portrayal of the Suffering servant, found in Isaiah 52:13 – Isaiah 53. Written around 700 years before the time of Messiah, it is a fascinating description of One whose mission it would be to bear the sins of God’s people, be cut off from the land of the living and rise again from death.

The passage itself is extremely clear, yet it remains controversial for the simple fact that its implications are so radical. Many Jews see this passage as referring to the nation of Israel itself, while others see this as perhaps speaking of a second Messiah, for they cannot see (or refuse to see) how a victorious world conqueror could also be one who is shamed and despised in the way Isaiah decribes. However, Christians believe there is just one Messiah who fulfills every prophetic prediction in Himself by means of two comings into this world. In the first coming, He came to remove sin by means of His sacrifice, in the second, He comes to reveal the extent of His rule as King of Kings and Lord of lords. He already is the Lord; He already is the King, though earthly eyes still await the visible evidence of His rule. Yet just as certainly as the prophecies of Messiah’s birth, life, death and resurrection were fulfiled in His first coming, so the King will come again one day soon to claim what rightfully belongs to Him. Even so, come Lord Jesus.

Here’s my friend, Dr. James White as he walks us through Isaiah’s astonishing predictions, found in chapter 52:13 and following:

Part 1

Part 2