Did Jesus Inherit A Fallen Nature?

Transcript from a panel discussion at the 2010 West Coast Ligonier Conference, Christless Christianity:

Questioner (Chris Larson): Doctor Sproul, if Jesus is 100% human and tempted in every way we were, does that mean he inherited a fallen nature from the fall?

R.C. Sproul: No.

Chris Larson: Could you elaborate?

[laughter]

R.C. Sproul: The first place is that Jesus is not 100% human. His human nature is 100% human. But He also has a divine nature which is 100% divine. Okay, so He has two natures, one person. Let’s start there. But the question really is getting at, if He’s in his human nature, 100% human, wouldn’t that necessitate that He’d be born with original sin? That’s what the question is, isn’t it? Because all human beings, after Adam, are born in that condition. This is the second half. And Adam was 100% human before he fell. And we will be 100% human in heaven without sin. So, sin is not a necessary condition for humanness. It is the universal condition of Fallen Humanity. No question about that. But Jesus came into the world without original sin and lived the life of perfect obedience, which was the foundation for the righteousness that is imputed to us in our justification. This is one of the things scares me to death in this whole thing that we’re going through now is the assault on the perfect active obedience of Jesus. It’s coming out of certain evangelical quarters. We have evangelical professors and evangelical institutions attacking the idea of Christ’s perfect active obedience. That’s a disaster to biblical Christianity. I hope I’ve answered the question. Jesus could have a pure perfect humanity without original sin.

Taken from the 30:00 mark here:

Health Update/Testimony

Psalm 28:6 Blessed be the LORD! For he has heard the voice of my pleas for mercy. 7 The LORD is my strength and my shield; in him my heart trusts, and I am helped; my heart exults, and with my song I give thanks to him.

The last four months have proven to be a tough road health-wise, but in it all, the Lord has dramatically intervened (at least on two occasions) to keep me alive. I have much to be thankful for.

If you have 16 minutes available, here are some of the highlights:

https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=68241152338117

How Protestants View Apostolic Succession

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZf0yfsTEAw&t=473s

What follows is a transcript of an question and answer interchange between a caller and Pastor Adriel Sanchez – from Episode 1489 of Core Christianity, May 15, 2024 at the 14 minute mark:

Question for Pastor Adriel Sanchez: Hey, Adriel, I was hoping you could talk a bit on the Protestant understanding of Apostolic Succession. I’ve heard some people say that Protestant churches aren’t real churches because they don’t have this particular connection to the apostles or the early church. Thank you.

Adriel: Yeah. Thank you for that question. I’ve heard that objection as well, and of course the argument goes something like this – our church traces its lineage all the way back to the original apostles through the laying on of hands through this succession of an apostolic ministry. And early on in some of the Early Church Fathers, you begin to see this idea and in part it was a way of guarding against false teaching, gnostic heresy that was floating around in that day.

The question was, okay, well, do you have the apostolic deposit? The word that was passed down through the laying on of hands, that ordination to the ministry. And so one of the arguments is that churches will make is, well, you don’t have that as Protestant Christians. Only the Roman Catholics have that, or only the Eastern Orthodox have that.

I guess what we emphasize a lot of times in Protestant circles and Protestant theology is the centrality of the word, the importance of the word. That it’s not so much an apostolic ministry that’s passed down through the laying on of hands, you know, through these ”apostolic ministers” but the apostolic message of the gospel, that’s what makes the church the church, because ministers can go astray but the word is the word.

And so you think of what Paul tells the Galatians, for example, in Galatians 1:6, he says, ”I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel, not that there is another, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”

These are very strong words from the Apostle Paul here. He’s saying, look, even if we as apostles or an angel from heaven came and, and began preaching to you something different than what we had given to you, um, that apostolic message that centers around the life, death, burial, and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, if they come with that, let them be accursed, right?

So it seems to me, what Paul is getting at here is the focus primarily is on the message of the apostles. This is what Paul entrust Timothy with, and what he encourages Timothy to entrust to faithful men that apostolic deposit, the word of the gospel. And so I would say a church is in succession to the apostles, so long as it holds onto that message and if the church goes astray from that message, well then it’s no longer in line with the teaching of the apostles.

And of course, there in the book of Galatians, central to the apostolic deposit is the right understanding of justification – the doctrine of justification by grace through faith that was being called into question by the agitators there in Galatia. They were saying, if you want to be justified, you need to obey the law of Moses. You need to go through these ceremonies. You need to essentially become Jewish, if you really want to be justified before God.

And Paul says, no, you can’t add to the gospel. And so again, thinking about what he says there, is his focus on the apostolic message and that’s what Protestants with the Protestant Reformers claimed that they were recovering the purity of the gospel that had been obscured by rituals, extra biblical rituals, by, by things that were not in line with scripture and I think that’s again, where we need to focus. If we want to be in line with the apostles, we need the doctrine of the apostles as it’s given to us in holy scripture. And that’s what the Protestant Reformers, sought to uphold.