After 2 full days of intense training at Ray Comfort’s Ambassadors’ Academy we took the gospel to the streets:
Author Archives: John Samson
Remembering God’s Great Mercy To Me
On Sunday, March 10 last year (2024) I had a saddle pulmonary embolism at the pulpit. Many don’t survive such a thing.
The following 48 hours were also quite astonishing. There’s no doubt that the Lord preserved my life in a dramatic way.
Here’s a text my wife, Linda wrote the following day (Monday), providing an update for the family. As you read it, please join with me in giving thanks to God for His great mercy to me.
March 11th, 2024
I’m so sorry for the slowness of this update. Tired doesn’t quite describe how I was feeling yesterday after hardly having slept since Saturday evening. I got a couple of hours’ sleep in a row last night, and it has helped immensely. We are in awe at the goodness of our God through your earnest prayers for John.
John was literally about 10 minutes away from being taken from his room to where they would have been performing a heart catheterization when a pulmonary doctor came into John’s hospital room. He had been included in John’s care because of John’s sleep apnea. He was very direct with rapid-fire questions, even as he was very approachable and kind. Within 2 minutes of evaluation, he said he was canceling the heart catheterization, and he wanted a CT of John’s lungs immediately. “Out of nowhere”, a change of direction most likely saved John’s life.
Within a very short time, it was verified that John had a very serious amount and size of blood clots in the saddle of his lungs (the area between the right and left lung), besides many other clots throughout his lungs. Everything went into action from there for him, having a procedure called an echo sonic endovascular system surgery. In this procedure, the surgeon inserted catheters into John’s lung area, and then the catheters were used to infuse incredibly strong medicines that break up/dissolve the clots. It’s actually pretty fascinating to read about this incredible technology. We appreciate your prayers regarding the risks and after-effects of these incredibly potent medicines.
John had no choice but to move forward with the procedure. All of us had already experienced the gravity of what would happen again if he didn’t. The fact that on Sunday it wasn’t instantly fatal is such a mercy of God. (I apologize that I told you that the surgery was going to be a thrombectomy. This is what the hospitalist at first referred to it as.)
The procedure went incredibly quickly, 30 minutes, but the protocol afterwards made for a long night for John. He had to lie in the same position on his back for 13 hours. He was originally told it would be 6 hours, but they kept adding a couple more hours and a couple more, etc. His numbers have been great (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, etc.).
However, he did have a 45-minute time this morning when his monitors went off for about 10 seconds, and then he felt incredibly “off” and had a worrisome demeanor/feeling. The docs believe this is part of the healing process as his body and more specifically his lungs and heart have been through so much and then have had what they call “insult with the surgery”. I guess that means these organs are “put out”. I so want to thank you again for your prayers, and I want to encourage you with the miraculous mercy God provided by the confirmation that the pulmonary doc gave me. He said that he almost didn’t come to John’s room because he had such a heavy patient load and was going to put it off until the next day, but felt that he was supposed to.
He confirmed that there would have been a huge risk to John having “thrown a clot during the heart catheterization procedure,” dying on the table. I was able to share with him how all of you are praying for John and that I believed he was God’s answer to our cries for help and mercy for John’s life. He actually agreed as he knew that he was so close to not coming, but so strongly felt that he had to. Please continue to pray for supernatural wisdom and guidance, as the blood doctor will now have the task of finding out why John has so many clots. (The ultrasound of his legs shows he still has more.)
The medication he continues to be given is for keeping his blood thinned out and for clots to not be able to form. John’s dad had horrific thrombosis for decades, so we realize genetically speaking, he is very predisposed (Incredibly, his dad still lived to 88 years old). I’m sorry if this is more detailed than you wanted to know. I didn’t know how else to clearly give God the glory for the great things he has done for us.
We should be moving from the ICU into a regular room tonight. Not sure what we will be told to do from there, but I will do my best to keep you informed. Thank you so much for your deep love and concern that has caused you to cry out for this precious man so profoundly and effectively. He’s still not out of the woods, and your continued prayers are so greatly coveted.
R.C. Sproul: Three Questions on his Eschatology
From a Ligonier “Ask R.C. Live” Event (July 2014) beginning at the 36:47 mark:
Transcript:
Questioner (Kathy): Do you believe that we are living in the end times that we read about in the Book of Revelation?
RC: Yes and no. Unless you think I’ve fallen into neo-orthodoxy and paradoxical theology, let me explain that. In one sense, everything that takes place after the ascension of Christ is in the end times. The end times started in the New Testament. We’re still in the end times. Now, I presume, though, what you’re asking me is, are we at the end of the end time so that we’re coming close to the return of Jesus as it was set forth in the Book of Revelation?
Now, one of the big questions in understanding the Book of Revelation, and interpreting the Book of Revelation, is tied to when it was written. The majority report of the dating of the writing of the book Revelation is that it took place in the decade of the 90s of the First century. There has been some significant scholarly work in recent years that argues, and I believe persuasively, that the Book of Revelation was written before the fall of Jerusalem, in the 60s, during the time of Nero, when Nero’s most famous nickname throughout the empire was “the Beast.”
And so the question is, if we could know for sure when the Book of Revelation was written, we would have a better handle on what period of history it was describing. Now, I’m in a minority report here, but in the Olivet discourse in Matthew’s gospel as well as in Luke and Mark is when Jesus talks about the signs of the times, and he talks about the destruction of the temple and the destruction of Jerusalem, and he said, “This generation will not pass away till all of these things are fulfilled.”
Now that phrase has been one of the most hotly debated statements ever to come from Jesus. I went to a liberal seminary, and it seems to me, I didn’t actually, but it seemed that I heard every day in class that Jesus taught that he was coming back within 40 years, and he failed to keep his promise. And that’s one of the reasons why we can’t believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God.
And so in terms of higher critical assaults on the trustworthiness of scripture and the trustworthiness of Jesus, the point of attack is on Jesus’ predictions about the nearness of the coming of the fulfillment of his prophecies there in the Olivet discourse. Notice also the timeframe references that are throughout the Book of Revelation, where it talks about those things that are “near” at hand.
And so the ultimate question is this, were the things that Jesus talking about on the Olivet Discourse and in the Book of Revelation, were those principally pointing to events that were going to take place in the First century, culminating in the destruction of Jerusalem and of the exile of the Jews. That’s one view.
The other view is that all of these things refer to a distant future time, and some people will say what… to both – there was a primary and a secondary, so this becomes very complicated in piecing it all together.
But in any case, however we understand Revelation and when it was written, and what it was referring to, or the Olivet Discourse, we’re still looking forward to the return of Jesus. And he hasn’t come yet.
And as I take great hope and optimism in this, is that every day that passes, he’s that much closer. And when I see what’s going on around us today, I have every reason to think we’re getting closer and closer and closer.
But of course, a lot of that is my hope. And I also realize it could be another 2000 years before he comes. I’m not into making projections, predictions of dates and days or the hours of that sort of thing, but we should certainly be vigilant today, and we should be looking for the coming of Christ.
Lee: And thank you, Kathy. So R.C., you hold to what’s called a partial preterist view, is that correct?
RC: Yes. Not a full Preterist view. Full, the full Preterist teaches that all of the New Testament prophecies regarding the future kingdom and the future company of Christ were all fulfilled in the first century. I don’t believe that. I still think there’s much more to happen, but I also think, and I’m in a minority at this point, I should tell you that, I think that we’ve radically underestimated the significance of what took place in 70 AD and the destruction of Jerusalem.
Lee: So how many chapters of the Book of Revelation do you believe have been fulfilled in that first century prophecy?
RC: Well, it would be most of them up until the last couple chapters when we come to New Heaven and the New Earth and the final consummation of the kingdom of God.
Lee: So, there’s plenty to look forward to in that?
RC: But understand this too, Lee, that in the whole scope of systematic theology, theology is a very broad science. We deal with the doctrine of God, we deal with salvation, sin and the Holy Spirit and Christology. And then we have the science of eschatology, which is study of the last things.
First of all, of all of those different subdivisions of theology, probably the most controversial and the most difficult is eschatology because so much more dealing with future events that we’re not looking back on, and we don’t have the 2020 vision of hindsight.
Secondly, so much of the information about the future prophecies of the New Testament come to us in highly imaginative and symbolic language, which makes it very easy to misunderstand.
Now, when I talk about the different kinds of areas of theology, as a theologian, my confidence and convictions of this doctrine and that doctrine are not always equal. I’m 100% convinced of the doctrine justification by faith alone. Okay? I don’t have any doubts in my mind in that. I don’t have any doubts about the deity of Christ or his substitutionary atonement. Those things are, I have total assurance of, but you asked me about questions in eschatology, and I’ll say, maybe it’s this, maybe it’s that. I don’t have views that are so solidified and cemented I get vehemently dogmatic about it, if you understand what I’m saying.
Lee: Yeah, yeah.