Article: Zeitgeist Debunked: Jesus Is Not A Copy Of Pagan Gods by Steven Bancarz – original article here.
It’s often claimed that the story of Jesus was plagiarized or adopted from pagan deities. That the ideas of his virgin birth, his baptism, his gathering of disciples, his miracle working, his title as the son of god, his death and his resurrection are ideas that were taken from pre-Christ pagan myths and mishmashed together to give us the unoriginal and recycled story of another dying and rising saviour-figure: Jesus Christ.
Zeitgeist, Religulous, and other such films and books have popularized this idea, which has since then become a favourite talking point of skeptics in the blogosphere. I personally have seen this point brought up so many times it is hard to keep track, with the same sensationalist memes being recycled around the internet:
We are told Jesus is just one of many dying and rising gods present in history, and that every culture has their own saviour figure with stories that are exactly the same as the story of Jesus in every way. Since we apparently have stories of gods that predate Jesus who have the exact same outline and ministry as he did, it’s suggested that the story of Jesus is a knock-off of pagan stories that come before him.
This idea could not be farther from the truth. As Bart Ehrman, atheist professor of Religious Studies at UNC, has said:
“The alleged parallels between Jesus and the “pagan” savior-gods in most instances reside in the modern imagination: We do not have accounts of others who were born to virgin mothers and who died as an atonement for sin and then were raised from the dead (despite what the sensationalists claim ad nauseum in their propagandized versions).”
While this idea may stop is in our tracks at first glance, when we dig deeper we find that these “parallels” are made up to such an extent as to be simply embarrassing. Jesus is not a knock-off of pagan god stories, and this is a basic fact of history. Let’s take a quick look at Mithra, Dionysus, and Horus, all of whom are claimed to have born of a virgin, killed, buried, and resurrected from the dead.
Mithra had absolutely no virgin birth. In fact, Mithra was not born in a literal sense, he emerged out of a rock.(1)(2) Mirtha was only born metaphorically, not literally. Mithra even emerged out of this rock as an adult, not as a baby. Mithra has no real mother, no virgin birth, no manger.
Mithra was never killed, let alone crucified. As Mithraic scholar Gordon Richard says there “Is no death of Mithras” (3). If he didn’t die, that means there was no “last supper” he wasn’t crucified, buried, or raised on the third day. If he didn’t die, he wasn’t resurrected.
Dionysus also was not born from a virgin mother. Dionysus was born from Zeus having sex with Semele:
“And Semele, daughter of Kadmos was joined with him [Zeus] in love and bare him a splendid son, joyous Dionysos,–a mortal woman an immortal son. And now they both are gods.” – Hesiod, Theogony. 940 ff (trans. Evelyn-White) (Greek epic C8th or 7th B.C.)
Dionysus died, not on a cross, by being torn up into a bunch of pieces by the titans (4). He was then boiled in a pot, and then eaten by them, and there are at least 6 different accounts of what happens to his remains after that.
While most restoration accounts of Dionysus are too ambiguous to matter, there is one story that reads: “Dionysus was deceived by the Titans, and expelled from the throne of Jupiter, and torn in pieces by them, and his remains being afterwards put together again, he returned as it were once more to life, and ascended to heaven.”
Pretty close to the story of Jesus. The problem is that this source, Contra Celsum, was written by the early church father Origen in 248AD, over 200 years after the story of Jesus had already been established and circulating. This is a post-Christ resurrection story. If anything, it may have been the Dionysus cults that adopted this idea from Christianity.
As historian Gary Habermas has said:
“I DON’T KNOW ANYBODY WHO THINKS THAT DIONYSUS IS PRE-CHRISTIAN, NOT THE RESURRECTION PORTION.” (5)
As for Horus, he also had no virgin birth. Isis had sex with Osiris after reassembling his body parts which were torn apart and scattered over Egypt. As egyptologist and professor at the university of Arizona Dr. Richard Wilkinson has written,
“Through her magic Isis revivified the sexual member of Osiris and became pregnant by him, eventually giving birth to their child, Horus.” (6)
Historian and professor Françoise Dunand writes,
“AFTER HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, IN THE FORM OF A BIRD, WITH THE DEAD GOD SHE RESTORED TO LIFE, SHE GAVE BIRTH TO A POSTHUMOUS SON, HORUS.” (7)
There exists not a single record of Horus ever even dying. Since he didn’t die, this means He wasn’t buried in a tomb or resurrected from the dead. Historian J.Z. Smith famously said in his essay in the Encyclopedia of Religion,
“The category of dying and rising Gods, once a major topic of scholarly investigation, must now be understood to have been largely a misnomer based on imaginative reconstructions and exceedingly late or highly ambiguous texts…
THERE IS NO UNAMBIGUOUS INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS OF A DYING AND RISING DEITY.” (8)
Trig Mettinger, a Swedish scholar and former professor at Lund University, has authored one of the most comprehensive works ever written in the field of dying and rising gods and its relationship to Christianity called ‘Riddle of Resurrection: Dying and Rising Gods in the Ancient Near East’. He concludes his book by the following:
“There is, as far as I am aware, no prima facie evidence that the death and resurrection of Jesus is a mythological construct, drawing on myths and rites of the dying and rising gods of the surrounding world. While studied with profit against the background of Jewish resurrection belief, the faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus retains its unique character in the history of religions.” (9)
Jesus’ life is a fact a history, making such parallels (even if they existed) irrelevant.
The story of Jesus can be established from historical sources, meaning any similarities we do find are unrelated to the origin of these beliefs of Jesus. It may surprise some to hear that all academic scholars agree Jesus existed as a historical figure. As Bart Ehrman says:
“There is no scholar in any college or university in the Western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” (10)
Graeme Clarke, Emeritus Professor of Classical (Ancient) History and Archaeology, has said,
“FRANKLY, I KNOW OF NO ANCIENT HISTORIAN OR BIBLICAL HISTORIAN WHO WOULD HAVE A TWINGE OF DOUBT ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF A JESUS CHRIST”.
Furthermore, some aspects of the life of Jesus are universally agreed upon by historians. Let’s take the crucixion for example. We can demonstrate the crucifixion of Jesus on 11 ancient independent sources, maybe even more:
Pre-Mark Passion Narrative
1 Peter 2:24
Clement of Rome
Mesa Bar Serapion (depends on dating),
Our best extra-biblical source comes from the Roman historian and senator Tacitus (c. A.D. 55 – c. A.D. 117) who mentions the crucifixion of Jesus in ‘Annals, book XV’:
“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.”
Skeptic and professor of New Testament History, at the University of Gottinggen Gerd Lüdemann says that
“JESUS’ DEATH AS A CONSEQUENCE OF CRUCIFIXION IS INDISPUTABLE.” (11)
“One of the most certain facts of history is that Jesus was crucified on orders of the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate.” – The Historical Jesus: Lecture Transcript and Course Guidebook 2000. p. 162)
So even we have pre-christ myths of gods who died in some way, so what? It’s simply irrelevant, since Jewish Roman and Christian history all confirm that Jesus was killed on a cross. And if it happened in history, that means it wasn’t plagiarized. Plain and simple.
The crucifixion of Jesus is a real event that occurred to a real person, making post-Christ stories of a dying deity of no value to the origin of the belief in the crucifixion of Jesus in the first century. The belief originated because the event really happened, not because early Jews heard pagan stories through the grapevine.
His baptism, his belief that he had authority from God, his gathering of disciples, and his working of what people believed to be miracles are other established facts universally agreed upon by historians. Because these portions of Jesus’s story are rooted in history itself, pagan myths have absolutely no bearing or relevance to the origin of these beliefs about Jesus.
1) Mithraic Studies: Proceedings of the First International Congress of Mithraic Studies. 1975. pg. 173
2) Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, 1994. Volume 8, pg. 757
3) Gordon, Richard. Image and Value in the Greco-Roman World. Aldershot: Variorum, 1996, pg. 96
4) (Paus. viii. 37. § 3; Diod. iii. 62; Phurnut. N. D. 28.)
5) Gary Habermas interview on Faith Under Fire, Season 2, 2005
6) Richard Wilkinson, Complete gods and goddesses of Ancient Egypt, 2003. p. 146
7) Dunand / Zivie-Coche, Gods and Men in Egypt, 2004
8) Jonathan Z. Smith, “Dying and Rising Gods,” in Encyclopedia of Religion, 1987, Volume 3, page 521
9) Mettinger, Tryggve N.D. The Riddle of Resurrection: “Dying and Rising God’s” in the Ancient Near East. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 2001. 221.
10) Bart Ehrman, Freedom From Religion Foundation Lecture, 2014, YouTube, 51:50 – 52:06
11) Ludemann, G. The Resurrection of Christ: A Historical Inquiry, 2004, p 50
In the video below, we examine a third argument against this notion that Jesus is a knock-off of pagan deities: